<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: some investigation of the client hang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inf.ed.ac.uk/chris/2009/06/09/some-investigation-of-the-client-hang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inf.ed.ac.uk/chris/2009/06/09/some-investigation-of-the-client-hang/</link>
	<description>Successes and failures at inf.ed.ac.uk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cc</title>
		<link>http://blog.inf.ed.ac.uk/chris/2009/06/09/some-investigation-of-the-client-hang/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inf.ed.ac.uk/chris/?p=51#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Thanks - the odd thing though is that lcfg-client does have two entries in /etc/services, including port 732, the one that statd had grabbed here - that&#039;s why I was looking at port 732.  If you &#039;grep lcfg /etc/services&#039; :

lcfg            732/udp         lcfgclnt
lcfgack         733/udp         lcfgslav
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; the odd thing though is that lcfg-client does have two entries in /etc/services, including port 732, the one that statd had grabbed here &#8211; that&#8217;s why I was looking at port 732.  If you &#8216;grep lcfg /etc/services&#8217; :</p>
<p>lcfg            732/udp         lcfgclnt<br />
lcfgack         733/udp         lcfgslav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxw</title>
		<link>http://blog.inf.ed.ac.uk/chris/2009/06/09/some-investigation-of-the-client-hang/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>sxw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inf.ed.ac.uk/chris/?p=51#comment-21</guid>
		<description>portmap (which allocates the rpc.statd port) considers itself free to use any port which isn&#039;t listed in /etc/services. The correct solution to this problem is to ensure that all of the ports we use for local services are correctly declared to the operating system.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>portmap (which allocates the rpc.statd port) considers itself free to use any port which isn&#8217;t listed in /etc/services. The correct solution to this problem is to ensure that all of the ports we use for local services are correctly declared to the operating system.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
